BUENOS AIRES — Argentina’s economy may have contracted for a second consecutive quarter, according to economists interviewed by Reuters in a November 2 report, adding pressure on President Javier Milei’s economic program as the country approaches a 2027 presidential election. Official third-quarter data had not yet been released, so the reported recession remained an expectation rather than a confirmed statistical result.
Household demand is central to the concern. Reuters reported that consumer spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of Argentina’s economic output, making a sustained pullback especially damaging for local businesses. A family-owned clothing manufacturer in Buenos Aires described falling sales, idle machinery and job cuts as it struggled with weak demand and cheaper imported goods.
The company example illustrates a wider problem but should not be treated as representative of every business. According to research cited by Reuters, thousands of firms have closed since Milei took office in December 2023, while retail and other domestic-facing industries remain under pressure. Individual companies can be affected by many factors, including management decisions and changing competition.
Argentina has also achieved important macroeconomic changes. Reuters reported that inflation had slowed substantially from the extremely high rates seen earlier in Milei’s term. Supporters of his austerity approach argue that stabilizing public finances and prices is necessary for lasting growth. Critics say the immediate burden on consumers and smaller firms has been severe.
Those claims are not mutually exclusive. An economy can improve some national indicators while households continue to struggle with incomes, employment and the cost of living. Inflation slowing means prices are rising less quickly; it does not mean the price level has returned to where it stood before a period of rapid inflation.
Reuters cited a forecast from consultancy Analytica that output could have declined around 1.5% in the third quarter after a 0.6% contraction in the second. Two consecutive quarterly declines meet a common shorthand definition of recession, but the official data release is needed to establish the actual outcome. Economists also expect a modest rebound next year, although forecasts are uncertain.
The economic picture is uneven across sectors. Energy, mining and agriculture have benefited from investment and export demand, while textiles, retail, construction and parts of manufacturing have faced weaker domestic spending. That split can complicate policy choices because measures that help one sector may not provide immediate relief to another.
Political consequences are possible as the October 2027 election approaches. Voters may judge Milei on inflation, job security, purchasing power and the overall sense of economic stability. A poll cited by Reuters showed significant disapproval, but a single survey cannot determine an election more than a year away.
For Americans, Argentina’s experience is relevant to debates about austerity, trade liberalization and the pace of economic reform. U.S. businesses and investors have interests in Argentine energy, agriculture and minerals, including lithium. Market opportunities may coexist with political and currency risks, and there is no simple one-to-one comparison with the U.S. economy.
The next definitive checkpoint is Argentina’s official third-quarter GDP report. Until then, the accurate headline is that economists see a substantial recession risk, not that a confirmed new recession has already been declared.
Sources and reporting credits
This independently written article credits the original reporting below:
